University of South Alabama
College of Education
Instructional Design & Development Program
ABSTRACTS


An evaluation of the reading Comprehension Strategies Module of the Alabama Reading Initiative with five elementary schools in southwest Alabama
 
Kent, Andrea Moore
2002
 
Chair: Hopkins, Scott
 
 
This study investigated the effectiveness of the professional development in the Comprehension Strategies Module of the Alabama Reading Initiative in a public school system in Southwest Alabama. Kirkpatrick's <italic>Four-Level Model</italic> for evaluating training programs was used (1998a). The levels were: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. A group of 74 teachers were administered a Reaction Questionnaire in which they rated their level of satisfaction with the professional development. The data indicated a favorable reaction. The same group of 74 teachers were administered the Teaching Reading Comprehension: Test for Teachers to measure learning resulting from the professional development. The data revealed a significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores, indicating learning occurred. A Behavior Checklist was completed by the same teachers (N = 77). The data revealed a modest amount of implementation. The ARI Reading Comprehension Implementation Questionnaire was completed by the same teachers (N = 81). The data indicated a high-level of implementation, and it was projected to continue. The ARI Continued Use Questionnaire was completed by a different group of teachers (N = 16) who were beginning their second year as ARI teachers. The data indicated a high level of implementation occurred the previous year as well as the first quarter of the new school year. Implementation was projected to continue. A control and experimental group of students were used to measure reading achievement. The experimental group received reading instruction for one school year from teachers who had participated in the professional development of the Comprehension Strategies Module. The control groups' teachers had not participated in the professional development. The first dependent variable was reading scores on the Stanford Achievement Test 9 (N = 81). The second dependent variable was reading scores on the End-Year Assessment(N = 163). No significant difference was found for either dependent variable, indicating that the professional development did not impact overall reading achievement. When analyzing the scores on the End-Year Assessment for individual grade levels, however, a significant difference was found between the groups' scores for third grade and for fifth grade, indicating that the professional development had a positive impact on the individual grade levels.


Return to the USA IDD Theses & Dissertations Abstracts Page