HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH/IRB
What should I expect for IRB approval times?
Exempt Protocols: 1 week
Amendments: Approximately 2 weeks
Expedited Protocols: Approximately 2-3 weeks
Full Board Protocols: Must be submitted at least 2 weeks prior to the meeting. Click here to access the IRB submission and meeting date schedule.
What happens to my protocol after it is submitted to the IRB?
The IRB Office processes the submitted protocol, inputs information into the database, and assigns the protocol a unique IRB number. The protocol is assessed by the IRB office for determination of the level of review. The protocol is then routed through the appropriate review process. The IRB has available a flowchart on the IRB process which details the entire review process from beginning to end.
Does my proposal require a Full-board review?
Your study will require a Full-board review if it involves vulnerable subjects such as children, pregnant women, persons with disabilities, prisoners, and those who are institutionalized. It may also require Full-board review if the research procedures are particularly risky and have notable potential to harm a subject. Your protocol may also require a Full-board review where disclosure of the participant's identity might result in negative legal, financial, economic or social consequences. It is best to candidly describe your research design and procedures and allow the IRB to assess the level of review required.
I think my research is exempt. Do I still need to submit a protocol?
Yes. All research that involves human subjects, exempt and non-exempt, must be reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or by the IRB office. A guidance document called "When Is IRB Need?" may help you determine if your research does or does not involve human subjects research.
What are the primary issues of concern to the IRB?
There are four major areas of concern that are evaluated in determining whether participants' rights and welfare are protected. They are 1) the design of the research, 2) the balance of harm and benefit, 3) the process of informed consent, and 4) the selection of subjects. The research design is considered for several reasons. For example, if a research project is poorly designed, no valuable information is likely to be gained. Thus, such a protocol cannot justify risks or inconveniences to the subject. This is part of conducting the risk-benefit analysis. Another issue is that some individuals think of "informed consent" as a document containing details of the research that is signed by the subject. In the development of your research, think of informed consent as a process. Informed consent means that the subjects truly understand what they are agreeing to and all of the risks and benefits inherent in the activity.
How can I create a method of anonymous data collection (to satisfy one of the exemption criteria) if my research design involves administration of multiple instruments (e.g., follow-up mailing)?
Data collection instruments may be coded (i.e., insert number on paper), and the code linked to a mailing list. As the survey instruments are returned the coded number can be traced back to the mailing list. By matching the code to the mailing list, the researcher will have a record of replies received while retaining anonymity. The mailing list should be destroyed following data collection.
What do I need to do if I am not affiliated with USA but would like to sample USA students?
Non-affiliated researchers must seek approval from their institutional IRB first. Next, depending on the nature of the research, the USA IRB can do several things: 1) Defer to the primary institution's IRB; 2) Require the non-affiliated researcher to complete a USA IRB application and apply for approval according to USA's standard operating procedures. If it is determined that the project requires an approval at USA, the researcher will need to find an on-campus faculty member in the appropriate discipline to endorse the project and to act as a liaison/contact for the project. USA IRB will accept documented evidence of IRB training from other institutions.
At what point does a class project require submission to the IRB?
If a class project is done with the intent to share information within a classroom, IRB review is not required, because the federal regulations define "research" as a systematic investigation, including development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. However, if you plan to publish your data in any way (e.g. abstract, article, poster) or plan on sharing your data outside of a classroom setting, then you should contact the IRB.
Is anyone available to speak to classes and/or groups about the IRB process?
Yes, the Office of Research Compliance or IRB staff is available to discuss the importance of protecting human subjects/participants and the procedures with any group on campus.
Where can I find information on IRB assurance or registration if required by the granting agency?
USA's Federalwide assurance proof of approval and IRB registration can be founding by clicking here.
Federalwide Assurance Number is FWA00001602
Expiration date: 11/20/2011. This applies to all human subjects activities, regardless of the funding source.
IRB Registration Number
IRB00000286 - U of South Alabama Coll of Med
Are established human cell lines covered by OSHA's Blood borne Pathogens Standard?
Yes, unless the cell line has been characterized to be free of human pathogens. The letter of interpretation from OSHA can be accessed by clicking here.
If I am using human cell lines either from a commercial or non-commercial source do I need an IBC approval?
Yes, human blood, body fluids, tissue or waste specimen, human cell lines and non-human primate cell lines need an IBC application and are handled at the BSL-2 level. In some cases, the use of bloodborne pathogens may also need IRB approval. For further information about the use of human subject or blood, and tissue from human subjects, please contact the Office of Research Compliance and Assurance (ORCA). Additionally, if a cell line that the PI creates and is a species that may harbor a zoonotic agent then an IBC application is needed.
If I am using animal cell lines, do I need an IBC application?
If it is a non-human/non primate line from a public-commercial company (e.g. one that certifies reasonably healthy lines), a protocol may not be necessary. If it is a cell line that the PI creates and is of a species that "could" harbor a zoonotic agent then an IBC protocol would be needed.
What do I do if I want to transport hazardous materials?
If the hazardous materials are to be shipped, then certain about of training is involved depending on what it is. There are two categories requiring differing levels of instruction, the most stringent of which requires actual certification. It all depends on the risk associated with the substance that you are shipping. USA has both trainings available and tools to help you decide what category the hazardous substance fits in to. Training materials and tools can be accessed by clicking here.
What is required before using a respirator?
The fit tests are to be done annually for BSL-3 work and anytime there are changes in the fit of the respirator, e.g. large weight gain or loss, facial injury/surgery. The appropriate respirator will be selected for you, fit tested on you by a member of Safety and Environmental Compliance (SEC) to ensure proper fit ad seal, and you will be trained on the proper use and maintenance.
Where can I obtain information on signs and labeling for my research area?
There is a form for the researcher to complete with the information specific to their lab. That information is used to fill in the signs in to a software program and print them out. Sign holders for the lab door signs can also be provided. Other templates are available as well. e.g. the Satellite Accumulation Area signs. Contact Safety and Environmental Compliance at 460-7070.
How are IBC registrations handled?
IBC registrations are handled in two different categories. Work with hazardous agents requires a PI to fill out a Bio-hazard Registration Form. Any research being conducted with recombinant DNA will require the rDNA Registration Form to be completed. It is quite possible that one study can involve both activities. In that case, both forms will need to be completed. Every three years the PI will receive a notice asking if the study has changed, remained the same, or needs to be cancelled and the laboratory will be inspected once a year by the IBC. At any time, amendments can be submitted. All forms can be located online at: http://www.southalabama.edu/researchcompliance/biosafety.html
What are requirements for biosafety training?
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires individuals working with bloodborne pathogens must undergo bio-safety training on a yearly basis. As per our institutional policy, any PI with an approved registration from the IBC must undergo that same training yearly. This also includes any associates that are listed in the protocol. Training is located online at https://www.citiprogram.org/Default.asp. Reminders will be sent when it is time to renew.
What is an export?
An export is an actual shipment or transmission of any commodity (equipment or hardware) out of the United States, or the release of technology (technical data or information) about controlled commodities, or software (commercial or custom-made) to a foreign national out of or within the United States.
What are the goals of export controls?
•Curtail export of technologies that assist the military potential of adversaries
•Compliance with Trade Agreements
•Prevent development of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons
How will I know if I'm exporting information or technology?
Does the activity involve:
•A foreign company whether the activity is conducted in the US or abroad?
•A foreign national
•A contract with a restriction on the participation of foreign nationals or other restrictions?
•A contract with a publication restriction or an associated NDA or proprietary rights agreement?
•Taking equipment overseas?
•Foreign nationals (faculty, postdocs, students, visiting scholars, collaborators, etc) using equipment on USA campus?
How likely am I to come across any of these controlled technologies during research?
It is very likely that you already own items that are one the Commerce Control List (CCL). Computers, smart phones, MP3 players, GPS navigation systems, every day software (Window operating systems),etc all have components included in the descriptions on the CCL. Almost all are covered under a "mass market" exemption, but it shows how diligent universities have to be with the equipment contained labs and the data being collected. The potential to come across something "controlled" is unlikely.
What is a "deemed export?"
A deemed export is the transfer, release, or disclosure to foreign persons in the United States of technical data about controlled commodities. A transfer of "technology" or "technical data" to the foreign person is "deemed" to be an export to the home country of the foreign person. In non-government speak: If you are talking to someone from a foreign country, you are considered to be exporting the information contained in your discuss to where ever they are from. i.e. If you are having lunch at Panera Bread with a friend from Germany, your conversation is "exporting" information to Germany.
What activities are excluded from export control laws?
There are several exclusions, but two are particularly relevant to academic research: the fundamental research exclusion and the public domain exclusion. These exclusions can become void, if researchers make side agreements that contain publication restrictions or restriction on who may participate in the research. Specifically,
-publication in periodicals, books, print, electronic, or other media available for general distribution (including websites that provide free uncontrolled access) or to a community of persons interested in the subject matter, such as those in a scientific or engineering discipline;
-readily available at libraries open to the public or at university libraries;
-patents and published patent applications available at any patent office; and
-release at an open conference, meeting, seminar, trade show, or other open gathering held in the U.S. (ITAR) or anywhere (EAR).
-exclusion for "educational information" released by instruction in catalog courses and associated teaching laboratories. So, in general, no need for a license to share information as part of a regular course being taught at USA.
•Fundamental Research Exclusion (FRE)
Fundamental research is defined as basic and applied research in science and engineering conducted at an accredited U.S. institution of higher education where the resulting information is ordinarily published and shared broadly within the scientific community.
IF IT MEETS THIS CRITERIA, THEN EXPORT CONTROLS DON'T APPLY
What actions could destroy the fundamental research exemption?
University research will not be deemed to qualify as fundamental research if:
•The university accepts any restrictions on the publication of the information resulting from the research
•Research is federally funded and specific access and dissemination controls regarding the resulting information have been accepted by the university or the researcher.
What activities should I avoid?
•Discussing non-public domain technology with foreign companies and foreign nationals without have an export review done.
•Taking controlled technology oversees without having an export review done
•Taking foreign nationals on lab tours without first discussing with the Office of Research Compliance and Assurance
I have heard that Microsoft operating software is or may be export controlled. I've already been warned about not taking my laptop out of the country if it has obvious export controlled data on it but can I have a problem with the basic operating system?
Possibly. Microsoft provides information on their website at http://www.microsoft.com/exporting/ (or at the home page, search for "export control") that lists their different hardware and software products along with the DoC ECCN (export classification number) and the status of this item relative to requirement of a license for export.
ANIMAL CARE AND USE
What is the function of the IACUC?
The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) oversee the responsible use of animals in University research and instructional activities, including field research. The IACUC reviews protocols, reviews the animal care and use program, and monitors University animal facilities to ensure compliance with institutional and federal standards and regulatory requirements.
How often does the IACUC meet?
The IACUC meets on the third Thursday of every month. Meeting dates and submission deadlines can be found on the IACUC website.
What do I need to do to get started?
You will need to complete the specified training requirements, as well as, enroll in the Occupational Health Program (OHP) before you are able to work with animals. The training requirements can be found on the IACUC website, or by clicking here.
Who needs to complete training and enroll in the Occupational Health Program (OHP)?
Anyone who works with animals must complete training and OHP. An OHP waiver may be requested in circumstances where the named PI of the protocol does not plan to handle the animal in the conduct of the planned animal research activity. These requests require approval by the University's veterinarian.
How long does my training last?
Your training is only good for three years. The CITI on-line training program will send you e-mail messages asking you to update your training, sixty days before it expires. OHP participation is a one-time enrollment, except for those employees who handle non-human primates and require continued medical surveillance.
How do I fill out a protocol?
USA uses a program called GRANITE to submit protocols. The IACUC Office provides a guide on how to fill out a protocol on the IACUC website, or you can click here. There is also a tip sheet that the IACUC Office provides on the IACUC website, or you can click here.
What types of projects must be submitted for IACUC review?
USA requires IACUC approval for work with live vertebrates. The IACUC must review ALL projects involving the use of ANY vertebrate animals for ANY purpose (including, but not limited to, biomedical and behavioral research, teaching, testing, field work and exhibition projects) to ensure compliance with USA policies and federal regulations. Even studies which involve no direct contact with vertebrate animals but which affect animals through influencing or changing their habitat (e.g. observing the result of outside stimulus on bird calls, observation of fish or wildlife after modifying their habitat or interrupting their daily routine) must be submitted for the Committee's consideration prior to initiation
What are the definitions and classification for animal pain or distress?
Procedures are classified according to the level of potential pain or distress that the animal may experience. If more than slight or momentary pain and distress could be caused by the procedure, then relief must be provided (pain class B). If relief cannot be provided (pain class C), there must be scientific justification for the withholding of relief, the justification must be included in the animal use protocol, and it must be approved by the IACUC. Additional information can be found in the USDA Animal Care Resource Guide, Policy #11, Painful Procedures.
What are the attributes of major survival surgery and multiple survival surgery?
Multiple Major Survival Surgery: A major survival surgery penetrates and exposes the body cavity or produces substantial impairment of physical or physiologic functions (such as laparotomy, thoracotomy, craniotomy, joint replacement and limb amputation). Scientific justification is required in the animal use protocol, if more than one major survival surgery is to be performed on an animal during the course of the protocol experiment.
Does PHS Policy apply to the production of custom antibodies?
The generation of custom antibodies is considered an activity involving vertebrate animals and covered by PHS Policy. Antibodies are considered customized if produced using antigen(s) provided by or at the request of the investigator (i.e., not purchased off-the-shelf). An organization producing custom antibodies for a grantee must have or obtain an assurance, or be included as a component of the grantee's assurance. In addition, the applicant must provide the date (verification) of project-specific IACUC approval for the production of the antibodies.
My grant is for five years; however, my protocol indicates that I can only get approval for three years. How do I get an extension?
The three year limit on animal protocols is explicitly stated in the Federal regulations. We cannot grant extensions after the three year expiration date; you must file a new protocol.
What about use of dead animals or animal parts?
If the animals are specifically raised for you, then you need a protocol. If you are obtaining animals or tissue that was already dead then you do not need an IACUC protocol. However, the IACUC requires you to submit a brief memo, if obtaining commercially purchased (i.e. grocery store, slaughterhouse, Carolina Biological, etc) animal tissue. The memo needs to be received by the IACUC office before the animal tissue is purchased. The information to be disclosed is available here.
My project has changed quite a bit. What do I do?
You should contact either the IACUC Office or the Department of Comparative Medicine's veterinarian as soon as possible. The University veterinarian or the IACUC chairperson will determine whether an amendment or a new protocol is required.
When should I submit modifications to my protocol?
By federal law and University policy, Investigators are required to notify the committee of any changes made to an active protocol. Typical modifications may include addition/removal of personnel, numbers and species of animals, modifications to the experimental methods or procedures, special requirements for animal husbandry and housing, etc.
What if my research involves fish?
Please refer to "Guidelines for the Use of Fishes in Research" made available by the American Fisheries Society.
What if my research involves reptiles and/or amphibians?
Please refer to "Guidelines for Use of Live Amphibians and Reptiles in Field and Laboratory Research, 2nd edition" .
If I wish to transfer animals listed on one of my protocols to another, do I need to do so formally?
Yes. When protocols are approved, the number of animals to be used in the studies covered by that protocol is also approved. The Department of Comparative Medicine (DCM) tracks the number of animals used and assesses charges for their care based on the protocol to which they are assigned. Neglecting to transfer animals from one protocol to another may risk exceeding quota for on-going studies. Moreover, DCM needs to know in which studies the animals are involved to be able to provide appropriate veterinary care if needed. Animals can be readily transferred from one of your protocols to another by contacting DCM.
Where can I find information on IACUC accreditation, or assurance if required by the granting agency?
AAALAC Accreditation Letter
For use when funding agencies request a copy of the most recent USA AAALAC accreditation letter. You can view/download that document by clicking here.
Animal Welfare Assurance Number is A3288-01
Most recent renewal date: 10/23/08. Expiration date: 12/31/12. This applies to all animal activities, regardless of the funding source.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT
What is considered a conflict of interest or commitment?
A conflict of interest exists when an employee's financial or personal considerations may compromise, or have the appearance of compromising, an employee's personal judgment in administration, management, instruction, research, and other professional and academic activities.
A conflict of commitment exists when professional service or research contracted outside the University interferes with the employee's paramount obligations to students, colleagues, and the primary missions of the University.
Why do we review potential financial conflicts of interest?
A financial conflict of interest is a situation in which people might perceive that your financial relationships may compromise your professional judgment in conducting, analyzing, or reporting research or scholarly activities. Therefore, indiviudal units/departments reviews and manages these arrangements to protect the integrity of the research, institution, and individual.
Example: An investigator may have a financial conflict of interest if he or she is a consultant to the company sponsoring research in his or her laboratory.
Example: A faculty member owns significant equity in a company whose product he or she wants to test.
How does USA identify conflicts of interest or commitment?
The University requires faculty and administrative staff in a director position or above to submit an annual disclosure or as well any new activity on an ad hoc basis in order to eliminate or minimize their impact on any professional or research activity. This policy requires disclosure of all interactions that involve any amount of Financial Interest on the part of each Employee or Employee's Family as well as of all interactions that could be reasonably perceived to bias any professional or research activity.
When does the annual disclosure need to be submitted?
By September 30th each fiscal year, as well as any time throughout the year if your circumstances change.
Who determines if I have a conflict of interest?
Your COI disclosure is reviewed by your Department Chair. If a potential COI is identified the disclosure is reviewed in conjunction by the College Dean or Institute Director.
What happens if I do have a conflict of interest or conflict of commitment?
If it is determined that a financial conflict of interest or conflict of commitment exists, a Conflict Management Plan is created in order to manage, reduce, or eliminate the conflict. Management plans are reviewed, approved, and annually monitored by the departmental chair as required by university policy. Conflict management plans should be renewed annually and are effective as long as the conflict is present.
Are my financial interests treated confidential?
The decision of the departmental chair or College Dean or Institute Director may be shared with University officials as deemed necessary. In cases relating to projects involving human subjects, the recommendation will be shared with the IRB. It may also be shared with the research sponsor if requested. Other than mandated disclosures or limited internal disclosures, the information is treated as confidential.
What types of activities do NOT require reporting?
The following might appear to involve a Financial Conflict of Interest but in fact do not. Such activities do not require disclosure or administrative review:
•Employees receiving royalties from the publication of books or for the licensure of patented inventions subject to the Patent and Copyright Policies of the University.
•Employees owning or having equity interest in a company, the exclusive function of which is to accommodate the Employee's external research or consulting activities.
•Employees receiving nominal compensation, in the form of honoraria or expense reimbursement, in connection with service to professional associations, service on review panels, presentations of scholarly work, and participation in accreditation reviews.
What policies apply?
The University policy for Responding to Allegations on Research Misconduct describes the procedures followed when an allegation is made. Additionally, where Public Health Service (PHS) funding is involved, Federal Regulations at 42 CFR 50 apply. Other agencies, such as the National Science Foundation, also have research misconduct policies.
How does the University define research misconduct?
The University of South Alabama has adopted the definition of misconduct as stated by the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP): Research misconduct is defined as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion. This definition applies to all research activities regardless of funding source.
What protections exist for Complainants (Whistleblowers)?
The University will undertake diligent efforts to protect the positions and reputations of those persons who, in good faith, make allegations of scientific misconduct.
If I suspect that research misconduct has occurred, what do I do?
At any time, an employee may have discussions and consultations about concerns of possible research misconduct with their immediate supervisor, college/school dean or institute director, Research Integrity Officer or other University administrative officials. The identity of confidential sources will be protected to the extent consistent with the needs of an inquiry or investigation.
Can allegations of research misconduct be made anonymously?
While anonymous allegations will be accepted, it is often difficult, if not impossible to investigate a matter without the source of the allegations becoming obvious. For this reason, among others, anonymity cannot be assured. Often, if anonymity is required, an ongoing investigation gets to a point where it cannot proceed and must be abandoned because more information is needed but cannot be obtained. An anonymous source cannot be informed of the status or outcome of an investigation.
What are alternative methods of reporting?
Individuals who suspect research misconduct have several reporting options:
The Chief Audit Officer will receive and review reports and then determine the appropriate action to be taken.
Where can I find the University's Whistleblower policy?
The Office of Internal Audit maintains the whistleblower policy and hotline. You can access the information by clicking here.
Who decides if research misconduct has occurred?
If the allegations appear to have merit and there is evidence of wrongdoing, the Deciding Official (VP for Research) will appoint an ad hoc committee composed of three persons. The Deciding Official will select the ad hoc committee members on the basis of scientific expertise that is pertinent to the matter.
What can happen if someone is found guilty?
Depending on the severity of the misconduct, sanctions will vary. Recommendations for sanctions are made by the Standards in the Conduct of Research Committee and referred to the appropriate University officials.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH
What is RCR?
The acronym RCR stands for the Responsible Conduct of Research.
What does RCR include?
RCR includes most professional activities that are part and parcel of a research career and that are coming under increasing regulatory scrutiny. As defined by federal agencies, RCR encompasses the following nine areas: research misconduct, human participants, research involving animals, data acquisition, management, sharing, and ownership, mentor/trainee responsibilities, publication practices and responsible authorship, peer review, collaborative science, and conflicts of interests.
Which sponsors require documentation of RCR training?
NSF for awards made for proposals submitted after 1/4/2010. For NIH designated grants. See : http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html
Why is training required?
To comply with the Congressional mandate under the America COMPETES Act (applies to NSF awards), NIH policies for training grants and career development awards, and to demonstrate USA's commitment to providing the highest quality education for all students and scholars. Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research is fundamental in the preparation of our future scientists and engineers.
What is the America COMPETES Act?
The America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act of 2007 or America COMPETES Act was enacted to ensure our nation's competitive position in the world through improvements in math and science education and a strong commitment to research.
Why does RCR training apply to all projects if only NSF and NIH have RCR training requirements for undergraduates, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers?
Because USA is committed to providing the highest quality education for all students and scholars and believes that instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research is essential to encouraging and producing the best scientists and researchers for the future. http://www.southalabama.edu/researchcompliance/responsible.html
Do the RCR training requirements apply to subcontractors?
Yes, certification by each subcontractor is required.
For NSF proposals, how will documentation be tracked, verifying that requirements have been met?
The Office of Sponsored Programs certifies that USA has implemented an RCR training plan when signing grant applications submitted to NSF. The PI will be responsible for informing new hires of the requirements.
The Office of Research Compliance and Assurance (ORCA) will have to access to data available from the approved RCR training options and NSF funded research personnel. ORCA will review the data on a quarterly basis for compliance and notify PIs of non-compliance. ORCA will make this data available upon request from NSF or individual faculty member.
Where can I find USA's RCR Institutional Training Plan?
It is online at the Research Compliance and Assurance website http://www.southalabama.edu/researchcompliance/responsible.html. This plan meets requirements of the NSF COMPETES Act, Section 7009.Certification Requirements
Is RCR training required of all undergraduate/graduate students and postdoctoral fellows, regardless of funding source?
Are summer students required to complete RCR training?
Yes. Therefore, they must complete the appropriate training curriculum as defined in the RCR Training for Students policy document.
If I have taken RCR training at another institution does that satisfy the USA training requirements?
The online CITI training certification is transferable for components that are shared among institutions. If additional training is required, which is dependent on level of education, other requirements specific to USA are not transferable. Regardless of other RCR training, new trainees will need to take approved courses or the online training offered through USA. Training from other institutions will not be accepted.
Why are there different requirements for undergraduate, graduate student and postdoctoral researchers?
The USA RCR training plan is being tailored to meet the needs of the individuals and the career stage of those who participate in research. We believe a graduated, tiered approach is the best solution to meet these needs.
Is the RCR training requirement the same thing as NSF's "Postdoctoral Mentoring Requirement"?
No, the Postdoctoral Mentoring requirement is a separate initiative requiring the submission of a mentoring plan that is described in a supplemental document specific to each proposal submission. The plan is considered during the merit review process. Guidelines for addressing mentoring plans within grant applications are available on the Research Compliance and Assurance website http://www.southalabama.edu/researchcompliance/responsible.html
When do I need complete training and how long is training good for?
Online training needs to be completed within 90 days of hire. Interactive training for graduate students or postdoctoral researchers is required during the first year of conducting research. At this time, USA has not defined a training expiration period.
How do I access the online training?
Login to register a user account at the following site: https://www.citiprogram.org/
Will I receive a certificate when my online training is complete?
Yes, CITI provides a certificate upon completion. Those records are also sent to ORCA. The PI should expect to be contacted quarterly as to the names of those individuals newly hired. ORCA will then verify those individuals have completed training by access the completion records.
What happens if I don't complete the training within the timeline?
The responsible Principal Investigator will be notified by ORCA and a corrective action plan will be required.
How will undergraduates/graduate students/postdocs know if the training requirement pertains to them?
The Principal Investigator/Supervisor is responsible for notification of training requirements.
Who maintains the RCR training records?
Documentation of the online CITI training should be maintained by the student and the PI. If the activity is sponsored research, then documentation should be maintained for a minimum of three years. The Office of Research Compliance and Assurance will be responsible for monitoring compliance with the institutional plan. For NSF sponsored research activities, the Office of Grants Administration requires RCR training documentation as part of the close-out process.