CoTL Call for Proposals
Curriculum, Connections, and Careers
In 2020, Felten and Lambert elevated the urgency and value of human connections in Relationship-Rich Education: How Human Connections Drive Success in College. Seven years later, “learning through a relationship with others” is still a critical component to advancing student belonging and academic success, in addition to faculty and staff success, relational trust, and well-being (Felten & Lambert, 2020, p.xi; Pleschova et al., 2021; Wilson et al., 2025). So much has changed in those seven years: new generations of students, new initiatives to better articulate employer valued-skills, and, of course, generative AI. How have the ways in which we form connections in our classrooms, in our curriculum, and in higher education, more broadly, shifted or stayed the same?
This year’s theme, Curriculum, Connections, and Careers, encourages us to explore how our course design, curriculum, and campus initiatives value relationships and cultivate connections among students, faculty, staff, and future employers. We envision presentations that highlight relationship-rich AI usage, career-readiness course design, accessible learning spaces across modalities, and practices that foster intentional student belonging. Let’s consider:
Which relationship-building strategies have remained resilient over time, and which have had to shift or be rethought?
- How can we adapt physical learning spaces, course design, and online environments to foster social connections? How do we build an authentic community across hybrid, distance, and asynchronous modalities?
- How have the expectations and needs of today's college students shifted regarding what makes them feel a true sense of belonging? What does this mean for academic success?
- How do relationship-rich educational experiences foster the durable, human-centered skills (e.g., empathy, collaboration, ethical reasoning, professionalism) that employers prioritize?
- How can institutions help students translate their relational learning experiences, such as mentorship, peer collaboration, and faculty research partnerships?
In what ways has the integration of generative AI altered the traditional instructor-student
dynamic?
Where does AI risk substituting genuine human connection, and where might it be leveraged
to enable more meaningful interaction?
- How can educators preserve relational trust and open dialogue with students when navigating AI usage and academic integrity, avoiding policies driven by surveillance or suspicion?
- How might faculty and students co-create boundaries and norms for generative AI that promote transparency, critical thinking, and mutual respect rather than passive reliance?
The South Alabama Conference on Teaching and Learning celebrates a strong partnership
between USA, Spring Hill College, University of Mobile, Bishop State, Coastal Alabama,
Columbia Southern, Mississippi Gulf Coast, and the United States Sports University.
CoTL’s theme of Curriculum, Connections, and Careers allows us to showcase curriculum, course design and initiatives that are designed
to foster intentional student belonging.
Through a variety of presentation formats including workshops, panels, roundtables,
research talks and a poster session, we invite you to share your scholarly work in
a welcoming and peer-reviewed conference tailored to the needs of instructors along
the Gulf Coast.
The deadline to submit proposals is Tuesday, February 16.
Presentation Guidelines
Interactive sessions are designed to give the audience an opportunity to try out a technique, engage in group work around some interesting teaching and learning topic, or learn about and practice or technology.
The In-Person Interactive Workshop is 45 minutes of workshop time and 5 minutes of Q&A.
The Virtual Interactive Workshop is 40 minutes of workshop time and 5 minutes of Q&A.
Best Practices:
- Please design your workshop so that there is time for participants to ask questions and answers at the end.
- Include at least two engagement activities. These might include small group discussions, audience polling questions, think-pair-share activities, or other techniques that allow the audience to engage with your content.
- Be intentional about welcoming and including all participants. Design and facilitate activities in which all participants can participate.
Logistics: Each interactive workshop will have a moderator who will keep track of time. You will also have access to a computer and a projector.
The In-Person & Virtual Research Talks are designed to allow for a 15-minute presentation of a research study that is completed or in progress, with 5 minutes of question and answer.
We welcome studies that investigate a “teaching question,” a particular teaching practice that you have tried in your class, or another theme related to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. We also welcome studies related to student academic success, documented uses of a new tech tool, or an exploration of the student, faculty, or staff experience on an institutional or classroom level.
Best Practices:
- Please design your talk so that there is time for participants to ask questions and answers at the end. We recommend aiming for 5 to 10 minutes of questions.
- While this is a research talk, including one or two audience questions will increase engagement.
- Be intentional about welcoming and including all participants. Design questions in which all participants can participate.
Logistics: Each research talk will have a moderator who will keep track of time. You will also have access to a computer and a projector.
Panel discussions allow for multiple presenters to engage with each other and the audience. Panel discussions should include at least one moderator who poses questions following a main theme that each of the panel speakers have experienced.
The In-Person Panel is 50 minutes with Q&A built in throughout the discussion.
The Virtual Panel is slightly shorter to allow for online attention spans at 45 minutes.
Best Practices:
- Please make sure the audience has time to ask questions and interact with the panel members.
- Be intentional about welcoming and including all participants. Design questions in which all participants can participate.
Logistics: Each panel will have a room moderator who will keep track of time. Panels should identify a separate panel moderator. In person panels will have access to a computer and a projector.
The aim of a Roundtable Discussion is to explore a particular issue, event, question, program, or other topics related to the conference theme. Roundtables are particularly good settings for emerging topics. Facilitators will provide discussion prompts that may seek advice, feedback, or ask participants to share their experiences.
The In-Person Roundtable include a brief 5-10 minute overview of the target topics and 40-45 minutes of group discussion.
The Virtual Roundtable is slightly shorter to allow for online attention spans at 45 minutes.
Best Practices:
- Please aim for a brief 5-10 minute overview of the target topics and 40 to 35 minutes of group discussion.
- Be intentional about welcoming and including all participants. Design questions in which all participants can participate.
- Consider sharing community discussion norms
Pecha Kucha, meaning "chit chat" in Japanese, is a fast-paced presentation format in which the presenter shares 20 slides at 20 seconds each for a total of 6 minutes and 40 seconds. Slides should include primarily images, with little text, and set to auto-advance.
Logistics: Each Pecha Kucha will have a moderator who will share your presentation.
Guidelines and Best Practices
- Required: Please submit your PowerPoint presentation to CoTL@southalabama.edu by May 7. Your presentation will be ready to go when it is your turn to present.
- Use PowerPoint. Please set your slides to automatically advance every 20 seconds. Here is a tutorial on setting up Pecha Kucha slides.
- Use images on your slides to illustrate your main points.
- Limit your use of text and avoid bulleted lists. Remember, you have 20 seconds per slide!
- Do not use videos or animations on the slides.
- You may include a title slide with your name and the title of your presentation. This slide is included in your 20 slides and will advance after 20 seconds.
All proposals for presentation at CoTL are peer-reviewed by at least 2 reviewers. It is important to ensure that proposals are aligned with the conference theme and are likely to be of interest to the conference participants who are primarily faculty and instructional staff at regional institutions mentioned above.
We are weaving in-person and virtual options together on both days of the conference. When submitting a proposal, please indicate if you prefer to present in-person or online. Virtual presentations will be shared with our in-person and virtual audience via Zoom in one room in the student center. Virtual presenters and participants will be able to view other virtual presenters and the keynote speakers.
General Guidelines
All proposals must be submitted through the conference submission portal and will include:
-
Title of proposal (10 words or less)
-
Name of all presenters (all presenters must register to be included in the program)
-
Session Abstract (150 words or less):
Your session abstract will appear in the conference program. It should include a description of your topic, its alignment with the conference theme, and the general presentation plan, including your engagement activities and session outcomes/objectives. - Session Narrative (300 words or less):
In contrast to the abstract, your session narrative will provide conference reviewers deeper insight into the details of your proposed presentation. The narrative will not be shared in the conference program. Please include the following information:- the issue being addressed by the work presented and how it is unique and/or contributing to scholarship in this area
- how the proposal aligns with the conference theme
- an audience engagement plan (required for workshops, panels, and roundtables)
- how the proposal will be relevant to CoTL attendees from regional institutions of higher education
Evaluation criteria for all submissions include:
- Topic impacts Scholarship of Teaching and Learning or educational practices
- Topic aligns and supports the conference themes/goals
- Proposal includes an engagement plan